Me Before You

Doing very well in the cinemas – very good use of AB images!

The Crown – trailer

Sharing a few insights with Andre of New York

Hi Alex,

thanks for getting back to me. I am a graduate student at School of Visual Arts in New York as I mentioned. I am currently working on films and also building a portfolio in advertising portraiture. I have been employed in the past by independent (non union) productions to photograph behind the scenes and specials. I’ve been following your work for a few years now and have been inspired by your images and hope to continue my work upon graduating.

I am curious to know more about the creative process and standard business practices surrounding the creation of movie posters and still photographs for film marketing. I listed a few questions below. Thank you for taking the time to answer them for me.

Do most unit photographers belong to a Camera Guild and if so, what is the route to become a member as a unit photographer?
Actually there is no union here in the UK or association which is a shame. There is no association or any kind of formal contact between photographers operating in this rewarding area of photography. I believe there is something more structured in the USA. But I no Nothing about it. I understand there is quite an active group on Facebook? Hence the reason I run an active blog and wrote Movie Photos .. to put some info out there.

I know there are a few agencies that represent unit photographers in the industry. Do agents usually seek photographers who have some credits?
I am aware of only one agency based in LA I think? I deal direct with clients so I can not advise you on the ins and outs of agencies.

As for creative issues, I sometimes color grade my images before handing them to the producer. I will ask the camera crew about color temperature and focal length from time to time. But I was curious to know if you have conversations with cinematographers or the camera crew before starting an assignment and what that would entail.
Generally I do have technical chats with the DOP and camera guys most days about many different technical issues, ideas, concepts and equipment. We are all interested in what we do so talking gear and technique is always on the agenda. The specifics of grading is something I can confirm be looking at the DOP’s graded DIT monitor or if on film by seeing rushes. But lets not get to hung up on the technical. Content…. content…. content…. What do want most? Sharp well exposed GREAT images that engage the viewer and SELL the movie….

Do publicists request you shoot video as well?
NO. My view is I do not offer..BUT. There are days when shooting some clips is more benficial to the marketing machine than stills. Or more like at times during such days. Clips would be more beneficial. Stunt work with actors doubles for example.

Is it common practice to hand over RAW files them after the shoot?
YES
if they buy out the images they would be the ones responsible for having them processed and graded.
Correct

Also, what was your most memorable experience while working in the industry?
Oh ….Andre 25 years in the industry 65+ movies many, many great memories (and a few more to come yet!) … Flying onto a live volcano in a helicopter with Angelina Jolie that was pretty special… But to be honest I have been to so many beautiful and totally interesting places courtesy of the film biz its very hard to single out single events. I still love just being outdoors in the UK on a lovely day with white clouds a blue sky and some beautiful low light and an interesting subject to photographically explore……

Thank you again Alex. I look forward to hearing from you.

Looking forward to more books!

Posters and Specials shoots for movies.

Specials……. I would say from my experience . Specials are very much concept lead. Its up to the creative/marketing people at the studios / agencies to come  up with the marketing visuals and people like me will facilitate the delivered product. Or at least the component image parts for them to put together.
So for example Philomena poster which I shot recently …. is pretty straightforward. Clean background bright lighting.  it was about getting the two characters to inter act. Pretty simple no locations no fancy sets or props just capture a moment in a controlled environment on High resolution with good clean lighting. Something a good Stills photographer should be able to do as He/She has an established relationship with the talent and the technical lighting knowledge  And yes … there where concepts for this! More for us to show the actors than anything else so they knew what we where after achieving. It was a very similar story with the Iron Lady poster I did. You can see the similarities in the approach. This kind of shoot works well for me as I am good with the Lighting and can handle the situation. Never Let Me Go and Gambit where others ….. all very similar…. but effective!  Then there is the built set.. story / concept marketing images. Honestly from my experience over the years. These have been the least successful . A marketing person somewhere has the idea of telling the films story in some kind of set piece constructed image. Hours / days spent building and lighting cost loads … and on the day the actors always question what the hell its all about. Never worked to date for me!!  The best results for  an alternative approach…… Choose a photographer whose style of work compliments the message you want to convey….. Highly stylised work ….. Examples in the past of named photographers that have done specials on films I have been on….. Annie Lebovitz….. David LaChapelle….. Terence Donovan….. to name but a few. Leave it to them then to bring the alternative style…. Hope you’ve got a fat Cheque book!! But to be honest I have often found this goes of the rails. You end up with great images for Vanity Fair…. etc. Does Vanity Fair put bums on seats?? The producers are happy because they get to say….. Annie Lobovitz did our marketing shoot!! !! Really?? Because it probably ended up a mad scramble at the end with the stills photographer shooting a clean portrait of the main talent against white which got used for the poster.
The bottom line is as you know a poster is a relatively simplistic thing. You pay for top talent… Its in their contract that their on the poster anyway….  so you wanna show the pubic there in it!!! in a fairly simplistic way . as most posters are seen in a split second on a bus or passing a billboard and convey a subliminal message about the film. like Philomemena. Its Judy Dench and Steve Coogan (like I’ve never seen him before) in a relationship film. All credit to them it was a tough film to market that one . At the end of the day the success of the film will come down to …… If its any good!!! The poster makes people aware and the Critics help to decide the opening  weekend. but is the public that will judge it. If they go to see it ….. The poster is just an invitation. 

Philomena: behind the scenes with Dame Judi Dench

A mother’s 50 year search for her son, taken from her by nuns at the age of three and sold for adoption, was written about in a book. Steve Coogan was so moved by the story that he acquired the rights to make the film before he had even read it

Judi Dench and Steve Coogan in Philomena

Judi Dench and Steve Coogan in Philomena Photo: Alex Bailey

 

Four years ago Steve Coogan was staying in New York when, idly scanning British news stories online one day, he came across an article with an eye-catching headline: the Catholic Church sold my child. It concerned an Irishwoman, Philomena Lee, who as a teenager in the 1950s had been sent to a convent for young unmarried mothers, working in its laundry for long hours each day to repay the cost of housing her and her baby son, Anthony. She had no visitors there; her family had effectively disowned her. When Anthony was three years old, he was taken from her by the nuns and sold for adoption. That was the last she had seen of him, and for 50 years she had no idea how his life had turned out; she had even kept his existence secret from her own family, unable to cast off the shame of having been ‘a fallen woman’.

‘I was very moved by the story,’ Coogan recalls. ‘It touched me and spoke to me.’ It had been written by Martin Sixsmith, formerly a BBC foreign correspondent and later a spin doctor for Tony Blair’s administration. Back in 2004 a friend of Philomena’s daughter, Jane, had cornered Sixsmith at a party and told him Philomena’s story; he agreed to meet Jane, then Philomena, and undertook to find out what had happened to Anthony. His efforts to track down Anthony – which over five years took him to Ireland and America – resulted in a book, The Lost Child of Philomena Lee, which was about to be published when Coogan read the news story.

But something else drew Coogan in: the picture that accompanied the article. It showed Sixsmith and Philomena together, sitting on a bench; he’s smiling at her and she’s laughing. ‘They struck me as an odd couple,’ Coogan says now. ‘Here was Martin, a journalist, an intellectual, middle-class and Oxbridge-educated, who had got to know this retired working-class Irish nurse. That relationship struck me as interesting.’

Back in Britain, Coogan bumped into Gaby Tana, a film producer he knew, and started telling her about the article. ‘She said it sounded an amazing story, and if I thought it might make a film, would I like her to co-produce it?’ He contacted Sixsmith, established that the rights were available, and immediately optioned them.

As a result, Coogan found himself last December on a freezing cold day at Harefield House, a grand 18th-century pile some 20 miles north-west of London, with all the accoutrements of a film set around him. He was looking suave in a smart suit, with an expensive haircut and a light suntan. He not only stars in the film as Martin Sixsmith but also co-wrote the script (with Jeff Pope), and has a producer credit. At one point, Coogan strolled towards an elderly woman with a careworn air. They chatted a little and then broke into peals of laughter; she shoved him playfully. Beneath her brunette wig, this turned out to be Judi Dench, who plays Philomena in the film.

On that day, Harefield House was doubling for the convent in Roscrea, Co Tipperary, where Philomena and Anthony had lived. Inside, a large, handsome reception room has been comprehensively ‘dressed’ to resemble the convent: one sees religious statues, pictures of Christ, crucifixes hanging from the walls, photographs of nuns, and devotional knick-knacks on every available surface.

In the scene to be shot, Sixsmith and Philomena arrive to confront the nuns who had withheld information from her about what had happened to her son all those years ago. He is furious; she is calmer and more forgiving. ‘There’s anger in Martin,’ Coogan concedes. ‘He’s cynical. He’s not at all religious. But it’s not an angry film. Despite everything that happened to her, Philomena has kept her faith. We’ve crafted a story about these two people that became a sort of road movie; they go on a trip together to find out what happened to this boy. They’re two people with different world views, who come to accept other world views and how other people live their own lives. I don’t want to sound pretentious, but tolerance and understanding are really what it’s about.’

Philomena and Martin visit Sister Claire (Cathy Belton). Photo: Alex Bailey

Steve Coogan and Gaby Tana had moved swiftly after optioning the book, and pitched the story successfully to Christine Langan, the head of BBC Films. They decided to tweak the story a little. ‘The book is about the child and what happened to him,’ Tana says. ‘We thought the approach should be more of how the book came about. So the film’s about the relationship between Martin and Philomena, which isn’t in the book at all.’

They started to assemble a cast. Judi Dench was their first choice to play Philomena, so Coogan sent her an early draft of the script and went to meet her at her home. ‘We sat in my garden and he read it to me,’ Dench recalls. ‘I was completely hooked. I couldn’t wait to get started.’

Coogan the comic and Dench the revered actress may seem as much an odd couple as Sixsmith and Philomena, but Dench has form playing opposite professional funnymen; arguably her breakthrough film was Mrs Brown, in which she co-starred with Billy Connolly. Working with Coogan reminded her of that experience. ‘With comics, there can be a real dedication they apply to something that isn’t naturally their form of work,’ she says. ‘And then in between takes, of course, they make you cry with laughter.’

And playing an Irish woman was no stretch for her. ‘My mother was from Dublin and all my relatives are from there or the west of Ireland. The accent wasn’t a problem. When I read the script, I heard my mother saying quite a lot of it very clearly.’

Though Dench had signed up eagerly, Coogan and Tana found it harder to convince their preferred director, Stephen Frears (who made The Queen). ‘He was intrigued by the story, but kept us waiting for a while,’ Tana recalls. The fact Dench was already cast finally clinched Frears’s participation (he had worked with her three times before, most recently in Mrs Henderson Presents). He then worked with Coogan and Pope on rewrites of their script over a three-month period until he was happy with it.

Frears, having read Sixsmith’s book, was astonished by Coogan’s eagerness in acquiring it. ‘Do you know, he got Martin to sell it to him without having read it?’ he told me. ‘It’s extraordinary. But I’m full of admiration for [Coogan]. He has this tremendous moral intelligence. And what we have now is a tragic story about a woman whose son is taken away from her – and there’s another layer, almost like a romantic comedy, on top of it. So you have sadness and happiness at the same time.’

Between takes on set, Coogan and I sit down for what I assume will be a short talk. But we’re still there an hour later, so passionate is he about this project. ‘I’m not a Catholic any more,’ he tells me upfront. ‘I have very complex thoughts about [the church]. But I’ve witnessed second-hand how simple faith is a great comfort to a lot of people. And there’s a dignity and spirituality about that. I didn’t want to trample on it.’

Sophie Kennedy Clarke plays the young Philomena. Photo: Alex Bailey

What also appealed to him about the story was its universality. ‘It’s about mothers, babies, children – things everyone can identify with.’ Coogan also wanted to say something about faith and cynicism, about intuition and intellect, and use Philomena and Sixsmith to embody these characteristics. He and Jeff Pope had several long discussions with Sixsmith and Philomena. ‘A lot of conversations in the film are based on that. Much of the story is invented by Jeff and me:conversations, and some attitudes of the two principal players. But the bones of it were true.’

Sixsmith and Philomena both visited the set during shooting, and Frears says they were tolerant of the tweaks to the story and their characters. ‘Martin’s a decent man, and I told him he was a good sport,’ Frears says. ‘He’s nowhere near as cynical as Steve portrayed him.’ But Sixsmith stayed around to watch some scenes and even offered Coogan a few notes on his performance. ‘The hard thing was resisting my comedic instincts,’ Coogan says. ‘Martin directed me like traffic. He’d motion his hands to say “less” or “more” or “slow down”.’

Frears was faintly incredulous that Philomena was interested in visiting the set for the convent scenes. ‘I told her, you shouldn’t be here – you must have spent all your life trying to stay away from this place. But she’s magnificent. When you meet her, you have no sense of this tragedy in her life. She has no self-pity and she doesn’t carry around a scar. Judi’s character in the film is a woman who has retained her faith – and so has Philomena.’

Dench has played real people before on film – Queen Victoria, Elizabeth I, Iris Murdoch – but here was someone who was still alive. ‘It’s even more of a responsibility,’ she says. ‘It must be very disconcerting to see somebody playing you.’ When the film was shot and edited, Philomena returned for an exclusive ‘cast and crew’ screening. ‘She was sitting behind me with her hand on my shoulder,’ Dench reports. ‘I was terribly conscious of this person, and our responsibility to her.’

In August the film was screened at the Venice Film Festival, where it won the best screenplay award and left audiences buzzing with enthusiasm. It has all the hallmarks of a rarity: both a commercial and critical hit. It is not hard to see why. The central story, of a woman unwillingly separated from her son, is a genuine tear-jerker.

Yet the film is leavened with comedy that hinges on the interaction between Dench and Coogan; playing a world-weary sophisticate, he can hardly believe her excitement at flying to America, and staying in luxury hotels, where she rhapsodises about the all-you-can-eat buffets and the little chocolates they leave on your pillow each night. She recounts to him at length the plots of utterly predictable romance novels, which she concludes with the words, ‘Well, I never saw that coming.’ And Coogan’s deadpan response acts as the punchline.

But apart from the laughter-and-tears combination, there’s also a suspense element; here are two people on a mission in America, confronting a host of unknowns. Will they find Anthony? What has his life been like? Is he happy? Does he know about his mother, and will he want to see her?

I recently met Philomena Lee with her daughter, Jane, in a restaurant near her home in Hertfordshire, where she is known under a different name. She is now 80, a smart, well-coiffed woman with a taste for jewellery and a signature neck scarf. (Dench had already told me, ‘She’s far more chic than I am.’) And she turned out to be as warm, funny and generous-spirited as one imagined her. ‘I never dreamt there’d be a book about my life, let alone a film,’ she said. ‘When it’s your own life you think, well that’s the way it is, it’s nothing special. Can you imagine – Judi Dench playing me! I was so thrilled. And when I met her, oh, she’s a lovely lady.’

(Similarly, Coogan still seemed faintly dazed and star-struck to find himself playing opposite Dench. ‘There were one or two times when I took a picture of me and Judi on set and instantly emailed it to everyone I knew.’) Yet Lee had an inkling that Sixsmith had touched a nerve with readers after his book was published. ‘I was amazed at all the letters Martin received – from other people like me, women who had also lost their babies to adoption.’

After Anthony was born she moved to England; the nuns secured a job for her at a Liverpool boys’ school. Then she moved south to St Albans and worked as a psychiatric nurse and later in a residential care home. Over the years she wrote to the nuns and even visited Roscrea, asking for any clues about Anthony’s whereabouts. But she was stonewalled.

She had two children, Jane and Kevin, with her first husband (she has since remarried), but Anthony remained a secret to them and to the rest of the world. ‘Over the years I’d say to myself, “I’ll tell them,” but never did,’ she says. ‘It was so ingrained in me that I mustn’t. It was the guilt and the shame of it.’ She finally admitted Anthony’s existence to her children in 2003, 50 years after his birth. Within weeks of her revelation, Jane was telling her mother’s astonishing story to Sixsmith.

Philomena cheerfully admits the film takes a few liberties with the facts, but it is true that she still has her faith – though only after a struggle. Since leaving the convent she has never been to confession, and she stayed away from Mass for four decades. ‘I started going back 10 years ago,’ she says. ‘I still believe in the hereafter. I did feel angry at the Church, but I feel resolved now. You can’t go on feeling antagonistic towards people.’

That last comment sums her up. ‘Her own character is so splendid,’ Frears says. ‘She sets a good example. And it seemed to me if Judi was playing her she was in good hands. And I think she gives the best performance of her life in this film.’

It has all turned out rather well, given that this was an idea that started with a man looking at a photograph of two people on a news website. And now there’s a poster for the film that relates directly to its genesis. It shows Coogan and Dench as Sixsmith and Philomena, sitting side by side on a bench. He’s looking quizzically at her. And she’s laughing.

Philomena is released on November 1. Telegraph subscribers can get free pre-release tickets to see the film. For more details, visit telegraph.co.uk/subscriber

Full or Part Time …..

A film producer putting together a Budget asked me: Full or part time…… ??
There is no strict rule about how many days! It’s about getting the images that count and sell the film or TV production (in the ratings race and for that matter a theatre production or Musical or any other performing arts event!).  After all a film is a product and the first thing the public will see from a movie is an image and…. there is a direct relationship between media coverage on a film at time of release and the success of a movie over its opening weekend…… But I kind of think that this an obvious thing to say. But perhaps those producing or indeed commissioning a photographer to produce the valuable high quality interesting and inspiring images that will pull an audience or raise attention I want at times can be a crowded market place…. tend to forget? or opt for the cheap inexperienced fairly useless option? On the basis saving a few quid on the budget is going to help. remember films and indeed many products can have similar marketing and publicity budget as the the product cost to make. Yup … for real .. a film costing $20m will most likely have a similar world-wide marketing budget a time of release. Whats the point having the best movie  int he world and nobody know about it. Be under no elution .. Films is a product you make it market it it makes money you make another and we all get to work again .. Hooray the mortgage is paid…. Surprised at the mercenary approach.. Why? I work in a modern medium that one of the modern forms of media.. Film, Tv, Music, Internet, Press, and an important element of these mediums is success in their own lifetime… Its fine to be a composer, sculptor , painter and be dead for 100 years before you are recognised… But modern media is here and now and needs fuelling that fuel is cash….. I need expensive cameras lenses and computers as my tools and and infrastructure that costs big cash to support me in my endeavours so my approach to work is business like the luxury is that at times I can indulge myself in my art but I never lose sight of my commercial responsibilities – I am COMMERCIAL CREATIVE .. in that order….
Some productions elect for fewer days but from a more experienced photographer in order to get the images that count. Others go for more days from some one less experienced but run the risk of not necessarily getting a good collection of definitive marketing images.
The trick is to have some preconceived ideas of imagery that will sell the film and offer that as a brief to your chosen photographer and support them on the day to make sure they get the productions cooperation. Do not leave the brief vague regardless which route you go down. Otherwise it’s pointless!
Also you must consider post production and file management ie presenting the work and organising the files. This is chargeable it is time consuming and important So should be taken into account I charge on a half day basis … Basically … every 5 days on set = 1/2 a days post production.

Interview part 2

Which movies presented the greatest challenge for you?

It used to be that films that involved a lot of night work were hard going, but now with digital and the hugely increased light sensitivity range of the cameras this does not pose such a problem. Contemporary productions can be challenging visually sometimes because without the benefit of fancy costumes and large sets the key images are not necessarily obvious. A little lateral thinking and some inventive approaches to the day-to-day photography are required.

What genre do you enjoy shooting the most?

Variety is the spice of life!! I have endeavored never to be pigeon holed as a movie photographer that specializes in one genre, rather selecting assignments that demonstrate versatility. This I believe is reflected in the range of work contained on my web site.
Are period shoots more or less difficult to work on?

They can be a bit tedious sometimes with all the fiddling that goes on with hair, make- up, costume, and I have to be careful and observant that when shooting that everything is how it should be. No hairnets and costume clips!
What was it like to work on the set of Tomb Raider?

Fantastic. I am not sure that as now so much more can be done digitally if we were making those films now, whether we would go on such extensive locations and I think more of the stunts would be done as CGI against green screens, which is a no hoper for me. Tomb Raiders where the best for adventure and locations.

Did you learn any moves from Angelina?

Yes, not karate or kick boxing, but out and out professionalism. She really is incredible, I spent a lot of down time off visiting orphanages and the under privileged in Kenya, China and Cambodia with her. Taking photos as an extra to promote charities. It showed me that if you have that power and attraction you can use it positively, the best moves of all.

What inspired your most creative concepts?

I have been inspired by a range of photographers and visual artists; I am constantly keeping up to date with worldwide styles of photography and other visual mediums. This I translate into my work, or rather I think it becomes subconscious you just keep finding yourself going down creative avenues that afterwards you realize are inspired by other imagery but interpreted into your own work.

Notably I would say that photographers: Bill Brandt and Cartier-Bresson have been influential and artists such as the Impressionists and Banksy come to mind. But then I am attracted by the surreal and abstract.

How do props add a different dimension to an image?

Relevant Props really help when doing set up photos of the actors, essentially they give them something to play off and bring an extra dimension, however they are of course ancillary and should not take over the photo.